水力发电学报
            首 页   |   期刊介绍   |   编委会   |   投稿须知   |   下载中心   |   联系我们   |   学术规范   |   编辑部公告   |   English

水力发电学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 84-93.doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20160510

• 水力发电学报 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同台阶数的过渡阶梯对阶梯溢流坝面压强及消能特性的影响研究

  

  • 出版日期:2016-05-25 发布日期:2016-05-25

Impact of transition ladder with different number of steps on dam surface pressure and energy dissipation of stepped spillway

  • Online:2016-05-25 Published:2016-05-25

Abstract: The energy dissipator of flaring gate pier, stepped spillway and stilling basin has effectively solved the problems of high-velocity flows that have occurred under large discharge per unit width and high working head of the dams in China. It often adopts a transition ladder connecting the flaring gate pier to stepped spillway section. This paper presents a numerical simulation study on the transition ladder design for the spillway of Ahai hydropower station, using a 3-D flow model equipped with a RNG turbulence model, water-gas two-phase VOF method, PISO algorithm for velocity-pressure coupling, and a geometry reconstruction scheme for unsteady flow iteration solution to generate free surfaces. The 3-D flow simulations were conducted for four design schemes of this integrated energy dissipator: three schemes with transition ladders of one step, two steps and three steps respectively and the same step sizes of 2 m high and 1.5 m wide, and one scheme for the primary design with no transition ladder. Simulations show that in all the ladder schemes, negative pressure occurs in the head ladder and pressure on the solid surface of the head ladder is distributed in the same pattern. And in all the three cases, the lowest pressure on vertical step faces is negative and occurs at Section 22.56 m, with its value (-0.90 kPa) significantly higher than that of the primary design case (-4.47 kPa). On the horizontal step faces of the transition ladder cases, the lowest pressure (-0.60 kPa) is also higher than the corresponding value (-3.90 kPa) of the primary design. This indicates that the number of ladder steps has no considerable effects on the negative pressure or its distribution. Its effect on energy dissipation, however, is significant. Our results reveal that of the three ladder schemes, the two-step transition ladder can achieve the highest energy dissipation ratio (34.2%) and its head step has a much greater dissipation effect than the other one.

京ICP备13015787号-3
版权所有 © 2013《水力发电学报》编辑部
编辑部地址:中国北京清华大学水电工程系 邮政编码:100084 电话:010-62783813
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn